Two academics who are also respected book authors said recently that secularism is just as much a religion as is Christianity and Islam.
Margaret Somerville, director of the Center of Medicine, Ethics and Law at McGill University, recently called secularism “The most encompassing religion that functions as a basket holding all the other [secular faiths],” in an article she wrote for The Montreal Gazette.
In Somerville’s article, “Religion has a role to play in the public square” she wrote, “It’s a mistake to accept that secularism is neutral. It too is a belief system used to bind people together. We need all voices to be heard in the democratic public square, and they have a right to be heard.”
Somerville also wrote the book, The Ethical Imagination: Journeys of the Human Spirit.
Her views were echoed by Ian Buruma, the Henry R. Luce Professor of Democracy, Human Rights & Journalism at Bard College, NY. In rd magazine Buruma said, “Secularism can be turned into a kind of dogma of its own which is the case of France after the revolution. Reason was almost treated as a matter of faith.”
Buruma, who also wrote the book Taming the Gods, said secularism, like laicite is ideological. “To extol reason as the highest form of human expression, that wants to ban religious symbols from public places and so on…it can become quite dogmatic, which secularism doesn’t have to be,” according to rd magazine.
Somerville cited a wide range of secular religions, quoting religious studies scholars Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young.
Some examples are humanism, atheism, scientism and moralism which all have adherents bound through a common belief and ideology.
Somerville said they are harmful when, as Richard Dawkins does with scientism, they are used to deny any space for spirituality and traditional religion in the public square and replaced with secularism, according to The Montreal Gazette.
Somerville adds that separation of church and state is simply a doctrine meant to protect the state from being controlled or wrongfully interfered with by a religion or religions, and to protect religions, within their valid sphere of operation, from state interference or control.
She contrasts this with Islamic societies like Iran where no separation exists, and China where the government interferes in the appointment of Roman Catholic bishops.
She concludes, “Values conflicts cannot be solved by excluding religious voices from the public square. On the contrary, doing so is likely to exacerbate those conflicts.”


