A new study shows a link between one’s concept of God and the strength of one’s inclination to cheat.
The study, Mean Gods make Good People: Different Views of God Predict Cheating Behavior, showed that those who viewed God as compassionate and loving were more likely to cheat than those who saw God as harsh and punitive, The Los Angeles Times said.
The study was conducted by Azim F. Shariff, a psychologist from the University of Oregon, and Ara Norenzayan of the University of British Columbia. It was published in the International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, UPI said.
The researchers said that they conducted the study in order to contribute to a larger understanding of the role that religion plays in lending adherence to moral behavior, according to UPI.
The study pointed out while ethical behavior does not vary between believers and nonbelievers in God, there is a wide difference in ethical behavior linked to how one perceives God, the Los Angeles Times said.
Those who adhere to the concept of a loving and compassionate God showed a greater tendency to cheat than those who saw God as punitive, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Shariff told The Register-Guard that he was not surprised by the findings of the study, which he said fell in line with a “supernatural punishment hypothesis” that societies have long recognized.
Shariff told The Register-Guard, “Rulers have known for a long time that God is an incredibly effective way of keeping people in line.” He was, however, surprised at the finding that students who see God as forgiving and compassionate have a larger inclination to cheat.
Shariff said, “It almost gives people license to act in an immoral way because they have a supernatural agent who will forgive them regardless of what they do. They’ll think, ‘It’s OK to do this because I won’t be judged too harshly because my God is a forgiving God,’ ” The Register-Guard reported.
However, Shariff told The Register-Guard that those who believe in a harsh God may internalize fear of punishment and this can direct their behavior. “They’ve made that decision at some point already, so they don’t have to make it every single time.”
Methodology
The survey was administered to 100 college students. In the first part, 61 students were asked to rate God on 14 traits, for example half punitive, half loving, highly punitive and highly loving, The Register-Guard said.
Immediately after, they were asked to do a math test. However, the math test was designed to be tedious, and the ability to cheat was deliberately easy so that students would be encouraged to cheat, according to The Register-Guard.
In the second part of the experiment, 39 students were asked to fill the same questionnaire about their belief and concept of God. However, to further boost against “priming,” the students were made to wait several days before taking the same math test, UPI reported.
The survey also corrected for ethnicity, religious affiliation and personality traits which might influence the survey results, the Los Angeles Times said.
The findings of the study showed that 60 percent of the students were “low cheaters,” compared to 40 percent who were “high cheaters,” The Register-Guard said.
Shariff said that most studies, including this one, show that there is no gap in terms of moral behavior between people who are religious and those who are atheist, The Register-Guard reported.
Absolutism vs. relativism
Paul Froese, author of America’s Four Gods-What We Say About God and What That Says About Us, said of Shariff’s study, “More wrathful images of God are related to moral absolutism, while people with benevolent, loving images of God tend to be moral relativists,” the Los Angeles Times reported.
Shariff told The Register-Guard, “College students typically are less religious than the population as a whole, so it’s possible that the cheating gap between believers of a loving God and believers of an angry God is actually understated compared to what might be found in the larger society.”

