Every once in awhile, a movie comes out of nowhere and sneaks up on you with a pleasant surprise. The Big Year is one of those movies. There has been very little promotion for this film which makes one wonder if 20th Century Fox has low expectations for it as well. There has been some talk of disappointment that the film would be rated PG. Why is there such an assumption that a comedy has to be rated R to be funny or any good?
A Big Year is a term that many have never heard of before myself included. It is an informal competition among “Birders” (not “Bird Watchers” as one would suppose) who can see or hear the largest number of species of birds within a single calendar year. This is a big deal as anyone involved in the Audubon Society can tell you. In fact, at the preview I attended, we sat next to a large group of Audubon members. My wife was talking to younger member about the organization and foolishly mentioned that she knew nothing about birds. At that moment, at least three members swung their heads around to see who would utter such ignorance. If you don’t know birds, but would like to see this movie, you have been warned.
The Big Year is directed by David Frankel, the guy behind The Devil Wears Prada and Marley and Me. It stars Steve Martin, Jack Black and Owen Wilson. With a trio like that, you might expect a slapstick comedy, but you would be wrong. It isn’t the funniest movie you’ll ever see, but is very enjoyable. Just don’t expect another Planes, Trains and Automobiles. Instead, Big Year is a hybrid of a road movie, a buddy film and a documentary. And it’s not about birds. It’s about marriage, family and friendship. It’s about following your dream but not to the exclusion of what is really important.
Stu Pressler (Martin) is a high-powered businessman who retires, twice, in order to pursue his dream of a Big Year. On the other end of the spectrum is Brad Harris (Black) who is young and having trouble making ends meet. He struggles with thoughts of failure and dreams of winning a Big Year. In the middle is Kenny Bostik (Wilson) a successful contractor and reigning champ of birding who will do anything to keep from losing his title. In this character driven story, the three actors share the screen time well together and show off each actor’s qualities that we’ve come to know and love.
The Big Year will take you to locations all over the United States from January 1 to December 31 – all in 100 minutes. You’ll experience every kind of weather and season, meet a variety of birders and get up close to lots and lots of birds. The photography is beautiful and the soundtrack is just bouncy enough to keep things moving.
The film features a long list stars playing bit parts including Brian Dennehy and Dianne Wiest (as Brad’s parents), Rosamund Pike (as Kenny’s wife) and JoBeth Williams (as Stu’s wife). Others along for the ride include Anjelica Huston, Rashida Jones, Joel McHale, Steven Weber and Corbin Bernsen.
The Big Year is not only a feel good movie. It’s one that you can take grandma or an older teen and not be embarrassed with the content. And you just might learn something about yourself too.
Originally posted here.
Movie: Jerusalem Countdown
Staring: David A. R. White, Anna Zielinski, Lee Majors, Jaci Valesquez, Stacy Keach, Randy Travis
The second problem I wrestled with is that this faith-based movie, produced by Pure Flix Entertainment, is yet another “rapture” story which tend to not sit well with me. As a man of faith, I think it best to try to win others over with the good news, not scare the hell out of them. Fortunately, the rapture theme is secondary to the main storylines and doesn’t come off as depressing as one might think.
The third reason is that JC is almost certainly the first chapter in a series of movies, so the ending doesn’t really feel like an ending. Some may be asking for more, but I think Hollywood should get back to the notion that each story/movie should be able to stand on its’ own merit. But that’s just me.
The marketing for this film is strange as well. I’m sure that many of you have never even heard of it, but for those who have will know that the posters proudly display the names of Lee Majors, Stacy Keach, Randy Travis and even Christian songstress Jaci Valesquez. However, each of them only gets a handful of minutes of screen time. The ones who do all the heavy lifting are fairly unknown actors: David A. R. White, Anna Zielinski, and Carey Scott.
This story is adapted from a best selling book by Pastor John Haggee. I’m a movie critic not a theologian, so I have a hard time knowing when and if a “rapture” movie is biblically correct. So, I have judged this movie on its story telling, acting, camera work, and action – the things most of us are looking for in a movie anyhow.
The storyline in a nutshell is this: When nuclear weapons are smuggled into America, FBI Agent Shane Daughtry (White) is faced with an impossible task – find them before they are detonated. The only people who can help are a washed up arms dealer (Majors), a converted Israeli Mossad Agent (Keach) and a by-the-book CIA deputy director (Travis). However, the bulk of the story centers on Agent Shane and his partner, Eve (Zielinski) as they follow clues and dodge bullets. The production values of this film are surprisingly high for a low budget film. There is genuine suspense and tension throughout. The acting is also quite good. Although only in about 10 minutes of the movie, Velassquez is a spitfire of a character – who knew? White and Zielinski make a great pairing too. The biggest surprise is an extended scene with Carey Scott as a man suspicious of his neighbor across the street and finds him in a sticky situation. The scene plays like one found in the TV series 24.
Most of the lines are well written, but fall a little flat whenever “God” or “salvation” is mentioned, a problem found in many faith-based films. At least they aren’t too distracting.
To find a location where this film is playing, you’ll need to visit the official movie website. If you are so inclined, there is a form that you can fill out that to help bring the movie in your neighborhood.
Religious denominations have boosted efforts to provide families fleeing famine and drought in the Horn of Africa with insecticide treated bed nets, a mechanism experts say is most effective in halting the spread of malaria in Africa.
In the U.S., the United Methodist Church and the Union for Reform Judaism on 12 October separately pledged contributions that will provide more than 12,000 nets through the Washington, D.C.-based U.N. Foundation’s Nothing But Nets campaign.
“Malaria is a leading cause of death among refugees,” said Paul Spiegel, Chief of Public Health at the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) , quoted in the foundation’s news release on 12 October. The foundation is supporting the refugee agency’s appeal for 150,000 bed nets. “In addition to food and water, we need bed nets to keep these families safe,” Spiegel added.
“We’re proud to join UNHCR in protecting the hundreds of thousands of families in the Horn of Africa who need our help immediately,” said Chris Helfrich, director of Nothing But Nets. The Methodist church pledged US$100,000 toward the UNHCR appeal and the Union for Reform Judaism, US$20,000.
With reports indicating that every 45 seconds a child dies from malaria, faith groups around the world have been focusing on helping to stop the spread of the disease. Insecticide-treated bed nets keep out malaria-carrying mosquitoes.
A Methodist campaign that has been running for several years called Imagine No Malaria said on its website that in 2010 it helped reduce malaria cases to 135,000 from 217,000 in the Democratic Republic of Congo after it installed nets in hospitals.
Presbyterian World Service & Development, the relief and development agency of the Presbyterian Church in Canada, through its refugee ministry, has been providing emergency kits that contain mosquito nets to Horn of Africa refugees. In northern Kenya, this has been supporting work at Dadaab, the world’s largest refugee camp containing some 500,000 people, through the ACT Alliance partnership of churches.
“Mosquito nets are very important here in Dabaab. A huge number of people, including children under five and the elderly, are vulnerable to malaria because the camps are in an area invested with mosquitoes,” Ann Wangari, the Lutheran World Federation Dadaab area coordinator told ENInews in an interview.
In 2005, Episcopal Relief & Development helped start NetsforLife, a partnership for malaria prevention in Africa bringing together faith based organizations, corporations, foundations and donors.
“Churches are often the only functioning institutions in these communities located ‘at the end of the road.’ Their presence and power unite people to bring about lasting change for the whole community,” says the initiative on its website. The program has delivered 1.5 million nets to 2.1 million people in 15 African countries and plans to deliver seven million more.
With these efforts, the World Health Organization says enough bed nets have been delivered to cover 76 percent of the 765 million people at risk of malaria worldwide, and in three years, 11 African countries have cut malaria rates in half.
On Tuesday, ABC introduced us to Last Man Standing (LMS) in back-to-back episodes.
Despite its title, unless it improves, it could be the first ABC show to be cut this season. (The two episodes will be repeated on Friday).
ABC/Disney has had a long relationship with Tim Allen starting with the days of Home Improvement. That family comedy ran for eight years on the network, which led to multiple Santa Claus movies and Tim’s endearing voice as Buzz Lightyear in the Toy Story movies.
Obviously, they are hoping for lightning to strike twice with LMS, but are relying too much on the old formula. Instead of playing “Tim the Tool Man Taylor,” Allen is playing “Mike the Internet Ranting Baxter.” Instead of running the “Tool Time” TV show, he is busy with an outdoor sporting goods store. Instead of three sons, he has three daughters. Instead of being married to Patricia Richardson, he’s married to Nancy Travis.
Mike is a man’s man living in household of women. His only ally is his grandson, and he’s only a few months old! He’d rather spend time at his store, “Outdoor Man,” where men can buy guns, jerky and a camouflage recliner. In the pilot episode, we learn that Mike’s job has been downsized and he can no longer travel for work.
Instead, he is put in charge of the company’s website where he decides to voice his thoughts on “What happened to men?” on the site’s video log. Mike works with Ed (an underused Hector Elizondo) and Kyle (Christoph Sanders) the young new hire.
Back at home, his stay-at-home wife Vanessa desires to go back to work full time making Mike a Mr. Mom of sorts. His children include Eve, the 13-year-old tomboy, Mandy, the 17-year-old airhead and Kristin, a 20-year-old single mom. This is the first family sitcom I can remember with an unmarried parent.
The biggest problem with LMS is that the actors are better than the lines they have to deliver. The lame jokes are punctuated with an awful laugh track as well. It is nice to see ABC introduce another family show in its’ line up, but this one feels dumbed down and may be this season’s Hank, Kelsey Grammer’s failed sitcom of last year.
The two shows airing are “Pilot” and “Last Baby Proofing Standing.” The latter is better than the former, but not by much. Allen and Travis make a great pairing and are enjoyable to watch.
They get a few good lines in too. When Mandy the middle daughter asks her father for money and he tells her “no,” she asks, “Oh my God – are we poor?” Mike’s response is “No. You are poor. We (meaning him and his wife) are doing very well.”
On the screener that I watched, there was even a spot where the laugh track hadn’t been added yet and actually made the scene funnier.
Maybe they will be wise and either film the show in front of a live audience or delete the track altogether. Nobody wants to be remembered to laugh. The concept of baby-proofing the entire house should have led to much funnier bits than the writers came up with.
The second problem with the show is that the storylines feel fake. For instance, in Baby Proofing, both Mike and Vanessa make decisions for the family without consulting the other. By the end of the episode, they agree that they must work together as a team.
A nice message, but one never gets the impression that neither parent was that upset to begin with. Like you’d expect, all the storylines wrap up with a happy ending, but without the warmth you’d like to see. It would also be nice to get to know the kids better.
Currently, they feel like accessories. The writers of LMS should take notes from ABC’s better sitcoms, The Middle and Modern Family.
Internet users can now view online five of the Dead Sea Scrolls that for the past decades have been kept in a climate-controlled display at Jerusalem’sIsraelMuseum.
The website, which was developed by the museum in partnership with Google, features separate pages for the Great Isaiah Scroll, the Community Rule Scroll, the Commentary on the Habakkuk Scroll, theTempleScroll, and the War Scroll.
These web pages come with a magnifying feature that enables online guests to scrutinize the high-definition digital version of the scroll. Aside from the magnifying feature, the web pages also include brief videos and description notes.
The aforementioned scrolls were captured through the use of a cutting-edge digital photography with a resolution of up to 1,200 megapixels each. This makes it possible for viewers to see even the minute details that are invisible to the naked eye. To lessen the risk of damaging the light-sensitive scrolls, photographer Ardon Bar-hama used UV protected flash tubes with an exposure of 1/4000th of a second.
Discovered between 1947 and 1956 in 11 caves near theDead Sea, these scrolls dates back from the third century B.C. to the first century A.D.
“We have seen how people around the world can enhance their knowledge and understanding of key historical events by accessing documents and collections online,” stated Yossi Matias, the managing director of Google’s Israeli Research and Development Center.
“We hope to make all existing knowledge in historical archives and collections available to all, including helping to put additional Dead Sea Scroll documents online.”
“A perverse person stirs up conflict and a gossip separates close friends,” states Proverbs 16:28.
That biblical statement is so true, that even atheists agree. What used to be passed around in class on small notes of paper or overheard on community phone lines are now broadcasted through text messages or tweeted through Twitter.
Whether you call it cyber bullying or spreading an urban legend, gossiping is still trendy.
One website in particular taking heat for its part is Topix. The site links news from 67,000 sources to 450,000 new topics. It is a privately held company tied with Gannett, McClatchy and Tribune.
According to the site, “Topix is the leading news community on the Web, connecting people to the information and discussions that matter to them in every U.S. town and city….By giving everyone access to the tools to talk – and an audience to listen – Topix redefines what it means to make the news.”
Topix was one of the topics of the Today Show on September 28, 2011. In a segment called “Talk of the Town,” reporter Kevin Tibbles did a story on a small community in Mountain Grove, Mo where 4,000 residents have gotten into the habit of airing their grievances on the website. One resident calls those who post, “cyber terrorists.”
In the new story, Chris Tolles, CEO of Topix, says “It is really important, especially in civic discourse in a small town, to be able to put your point of view across without getting punished for it.”
He also says that when a complaint is lodged about someone “talking smack” about another, that they “take care of it.”
The Topix website does explain how to get posts removed from the site by sending a direct link to the content through their feedback system.
There, the moderators will review the content for violations of the Terms of Service.
However, the Terms of Service, also clearly states, “We have no duty to pre-screen your content or the content of others, but we have the right to refuse to post or to edit submitted content. You understand and acknowledge that by using Topix, you may be exposed to content that may be offensive, indecent or objectionable.” It even goes as far to say, “If it upsets you that the free expression of ideas is often headed and offensive, please do not use Topix.”
In the September 19, 2011 edition of The New York Times, A.G. Sulzberger featured Topix in a cover story.
In the article, Sulzberger also interviewed Tolles where he admitted that the site at one point tried to remove all negative posts, but stopped after noticing that the commentators had stopped visiting the site.
He also went on to say that the site received about 125,000 posts a day in forum for about 5,000 cities and towns. About nine percent are screened out for offensive content (like racial slurs), and another three percent (mostly threat and libel) are removed AFTER people complain.
To add insult to injury, the site even charged for the expedited removal of offensive comments but stopped after being challenged by more than 30 state attorneys.
Sulzberger also says in his article “Despite the screening efforts, the site is full of posts that seem to cross lines. Topix, as an Internet forum, is immune from libel suits under federal law, but those who post could be sued, if they are found. The company receives about one subpoena a day for the computer addresses of anonymous commenters as part of law enforcement investigations or civil suits, some of which have resulted in cash verdicts or settlements.”
But what about the innocent bystander who hasn’t posted anything to the site, but is talked about by others? Unless you actually read every post, you may not event know that others are talking about you. To get an idea of the kinds of post commenters are making on the site, the New York Times article gives a few examples where people are called out by name and sin.
Originally here.
Although New Release Tuesday (NRT) went online way back in August of 2002, many are still unaware of this free service. NRT continues to inform members of new releases each week…on Tuesdays. Becoming a member is simple as giving them your email address and creating a password. Each week you are given a number of free songs to download and sample.
And if you don’t want to sign up for one more service, you can download the same songs by “liking” NRT on Facebook. (You’ve heard of Facebook, haven’t you?)
On September 27, 2011, the NRT offered these song downloads:
By 2007, NRT grew in size creating an online community where members can connect with each other, post their own blogs, add artist and author profiles, music and book reviews, music videos, song lyrics and more.
In addition to this extensive site, NRT posts a podcast every Tuesday as well. As of September 27, 2011, NRT released their 211th episode of this podcast Featuring Exclusive Interviews with Switchfoot, Rush Of Fools and Big Daddy Weave.
The NRT podcast can be downloaded from their site or subscribed for free on iTunes.
A man in the UK was warned recently by police that the Christian cafe that he owns is in breach of public order laws because it shows Bible verses on a TV screen.
Jamie Murray, owner of Salt and Light Café in Blackpool, was told by Lancashire Police that a customer had complained about offensive material being displayed in the cafe, but the police did not specify what the offending Bible verses were.
The Café regularly plays a DVD version of the Watchword Bible, which contains the entire New Testament on 12 DVDs, on a TV screen. It had been doing so without incident for eight years.
The DVDs combine video, narration, text, sound effects and music to portray all 27 New Testament books from the Contemporary English Version of the Bible.
The police told Murray that a customer was offended by a Biblical passage and said that this was in breach of the Public Order Act, Section Five. Murray told BBC that he asked the two policemen, “Are you seriously telling me I could be arrested for playing the Bible quietly on a screen?”
Murray told the BBC, “I was quite incredulous at the way they treated me. I was told, ‘it’s offensive and homophobic material we are against.’” However, no specific Bible verse was cited by the police.
Murray told The Gazette, “I’m not here to insult or offend anyone, but the Bible is the Bible. We’re always being told we’re a tolerant and diverse nation. Yet the very thing that gave us those values – Christianity – is being sidelined.”
Murray asked the two policemen if he could display Bible verses that didn’t talk about homosexuality. The police replied that they would be looking for anything that would be viewed as insulting or offensive by people.
Murray told BBC, “I was just incredulous because we all know the list of things that we find offensive is massive and varied and we don’t expect the police to get involved.”
The Lancashire Police denied to The Gazette that they had asked Murray to stop showing the Bible verses, but did admit that they spoke to him because a customer had complained.
Murray is considering filing a complaint.
In 2005, the Lancashire Police were sued by Joe and Helen Roberts from Fleetwood, whom they interrogated over allegations that the couple had made homophobic remarks.
The police also stopped the couple from placing Christian tracts beside gay rights literature in Poulton’s civic center. Because of this, the Roberts’ filed a case with the help of The Christian Institute and the police had to pay some $15,000 to the couple.
Sam Webster, solicitor-advocate of the Christian Institute told WorldNetDaily, “Mr. Murray … may well have grounds for a legal action against the police for infringing his rights to free speech and religious liberty.”
Mike Judge, Christian Institute spokesman, told WND, “I’d have thought Lancashire constabulary would have learned their lesson after paying out 10,000 [British pounds] to a pair of Christian pensioners who they had interrogated over their views on gay rights.”
“Duty bound”
The Lancashire Police told The Gazette that they were “duty bound” to act on the complaint they received and to visit the Christian café. A spokesman told The Gazette, “The officer discussed the matter with the cafe owner and explained to them the legislation that is in place around materials that are displayed or broadcast in a public environment.
“At no point did the officer ask the cafe owner to remove any materials or arrest the man and we took a common sense and objective approach in dealing with the complaint.
“We believe our response was completely proportionate and our officers are always available should the cafe owner want to discuss the matter or need any advice in the future.”
Murray, however, disagreed. He told WND, “It felt like an interrogation. … We are approaching a state where people can be possibly arrested just for displaying the Bible in public. What’s next? Police going into churches and saying you can’t say this or that?”
Murray temporarily stopped the display of Bible verses, but now that he is getting legal advice from the Christian Institute, he has since restored them.
Judge, of Christian Institute, told WND, “We’ve all seen the police stand by while extremist Muslims hold placards calling for infidels to be beheaded, but woe betides a Christian café displaying Bible text.”
Webster told WND, “It ought to go without saying that reading the Bible out loud in a public place, or displaying Bible texts in a Christian café, is not of itself a criminal offense. I am alarmed that I even have to point that out.”